Contact Lens Spectrum
October 2005
Document #119
References
(p. 25) Discovering
Dry Eye: Tear Film Osmolality — A Newer Gold
Standard? By Kelly K. Nichols, OD,
MPH, PhD
(p. 40) Quantifying Regression
with Orthokeratology, By Helen K. Gardiner, OD, FAAO, Michael A. Leong,
OD, FAAO, & Ralph E. Gundel, OD, FAAO
1. Jessen GN. Orthofocus techniques. Contacto 1962; 6:200-204.
2. Harris DH, Stoyan N. A new approach to orthokeratology. Contact Lens Spectrum 1992; 7(4):37-39.
3. Mountford J. An analysis of the changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology. ICLC 1997; 24:249-257.
4. Day JH, Reim T, Bard, RD, et al. Advance orthokeratology using custom lens design. Contact Lens Spectrum 1997; 12(6):34-40.
5. Polse KA, Brand RJ, Keener RJ, et al. The Berkeley Orthokeratology Study, part 2: Efficacy and duration. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60(3): 187-198.
6. Polse KA,
Brand RJ, Keener RJ, et al. The Berkeley Orthokeratology
Study, part 3: Safety. Am J Optom Physiol Opt
1983; 60(4): 269-272.
7. Mountford J. Retention and regression of orthokeratology with time. ICLC 1998; 25:59-64.
8. Mountford J, Ruston D, Dave T. Orthokeratology Principles and Practice. Butterworth-Heinmann, 2004; 113-114.
9. Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O’Leary DJ. Corneal response to orthokeratology. Opt Vis Sci 1998; 75(11): 791-799.
10. Horner DG, Armitage KS, Wormsley KA. Corneal
molding recovery after contact lens wear.
Opt Vis Sci 1993;
12:156-157.