Contact Lens Spectrum
August 2004
Document #108
References
(p. 21) Discovering
Dry Eye: Using the Tear Film to Predict Lens-Related Discomfort, by Kelly K. Nichols, OD, MPH, PhD
1. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci. 2000 Jan;77(1):40-6.
2.
Glasson MJ, Stapleton
F, Keay L, Sweeney D, Willcox MD. Differences in clinical parameters and tear
film of tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis
Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5116-24.
(p. 51) Treatment Plan: Teach Your Patients the Importance of Persistence, by Leo Semes, OD, FAAO
1.
Moride Y. Ducruet T. Rochon S. Lavoie F.
Persistency of use of COX-2-specific inhibitors and non-specific non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in
2. Simons LA, Levis G, Simons J. Apparent discontinuation rates in patients prescribed lipid-lowering drugs. Med J Aust.1996;164:208-211.
3. Dasgupta S et al. Population-based persistence rates for topical glaucoma medications measured with pharmacy claims data. Am J Managed Care. 2002;8(suppl):S255-S261.
4. Zhou A, et al. ARVO 2004 program 4511; poster B972.
5. Reardon G, Schwartz GF, Mozaffari E. Patient persistence with ocular prostaglandin therapy: a population-based, retrospective study. Clin Ther. 2003;25:1172-1185.
6. Nordmann J-P, et al., Health and QOL Outcomes. 2003; 1:75-83 http://www.hqlo.com/content/1/1/75.
(p. 52) The Contact
Lens Exam: Corneal Thickness Measurement, by Amir Moezzi & Desmond Fonn, DipOptom, MOptom, FAAO
1. Donaldson DD: A new instrument for the measurement of corneal thickness. Archives of Ophthalmology 1966, 76:25-31.
2. Drexler W, Morgner U, Ghanta RK, Kartner FX, Schuman JS, Fujimoto JG: Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography. Nature Medicine 2001, 7:502-507.
3. Holden BA, Payor S, Mertz GW: Changes in thickness of corneal layers. Optom Physiol Opt 1979, 56:821.
4. Izatt JA, Hee MR, Swanson EA et al.: Micrometer-scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye in vivo with optical coherence tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology 1994, 112:1584-1589.
5. Jaeger W: Tiefen messung der menschlichen Vorderkammer mit planprallelen platten (Zusatzgerat zur Splatlampe). V Graefes Archive of Ophtal 1952, 153:120-121.
6. Lattimore MR, Kaupp S, Schallhorn S, Lewis R: Orbscan pachymetry: implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis. Ophthalmology 1999, 106:977-981.
7. Mandell RB, Polse KA: Keratoconus: spatial variation of corneal thickness as a diagnostic test. Archives of Ophthalmology 1969, 82:182-188.
8. Marsich MW, Bullimore MA: The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea 2000, 19:792-795.
9. Moezzi, AM. Contact Lens induced corneal swelling measured with Orbscan II corneal topographer [MSc. Thesis]. 2002.
10. Stark WJ, Gilbert ML, Gottsch JD, Munnerlyn C: Optical pachometry in the measurement of anterior corneal disease: an evaluative tool for phototherapeutic keratectomy. Archives of Ophthalmology 1990, 108:12-13.
11. Wang JH, Fonn D, Simpson TL: Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after hydrogel and PMMA contact lens wear with eye closure. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2003, 44:1070-1074.
(p. 56) Contact Lens
Case Reports: Trantas Dots or Solution Sensitivity? By Patrick J. Caroline, FAAO, and Mark P. André, FAAO
1.
Meisler, D. M., Zaret, C.R., and Stock, E.L.: Trantas dots and
limbal inflammation associated with soft contact lens wear. American Journal of
Ophthalmology Vol.89: 66-69,1980.
2. Frantz, J.M., Saloom, R. J., Green, M. T., Kumar, P., McDonald, M.B., Lesions resembling Trantas cots in a patient wearing soft contact lenses, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 104, No. 3 305, 1987.