Contact Lens Spectrum

References

Document #204

(p. 13) GP Insights – Eight GP Pearls for Your Staff

By Edward S. Bennett, OD, MSEd, FAAO

Wu YT, Zhu H, Willcox M, Stapleton F. Removal of biofilm from contact lens storage cases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6329-33. Epub 2010 Aug 18.

(p. 16) Dry Eye Dx and Tx – Diabetes and the Dry Eye

By William Townsend, OD, FAAO

• Huang ES, Basu A, O'Grady M, Capretta JC. Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2009 Dec;32(12):2225-9.

• Wang TJ, Wang IJ, Hu CC, Lin HC. Comorbidities of dry eye disease: a nationwide population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug 31.

• Solano MP, Ronald B. Goldberg RB. Lipid Management in Type 2 Diabetes Clinical Diabetes January 2006 vol. 24 no. 1 27-32

• Chiva A. Electrophoresis of tear proteins as a new diagnostic tool for two high risk groups for dry eye: computer users and contact lens wearers. J Med Life. 2011 Aug 15;4(3):228-33.

• Grus FH, Sabuncuo P, Dick HB, Augustin AJ, Pfeiffer N.Changes in the tear proteins of diabetic patients.BMC Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct 31;2:4.

• Grus FH, Augustin AJ, Evangelou NG, Toth-Sagi K. Analysis of tear-protein patterns as a diagnostic tool for the detection of dry eyes. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr-Jun;8(2):90-7.

• Stern ME, Gao J, Siemasko KF, Beuerman RW, Pflugfelder SC. The role of the lacrimal functional unit in the pathophysiology of dry

eye. Exp Eye Res. 2004 Mar;78(3):409-16.

• Bansal V, Kalita J, Misra UK Diabetic neuropathy. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:95–100

• Cousen P, Cackett P, Bennett H, Swa K, Dhillon B. Tear production and corneal sensitivity in diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):371-3.

• Saini JS, Mittal S. Graded corneal sensitivity for screening of diabetic retinopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1996 Dec;44(4):219-23.

• Viso E et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic meibomian gland dysfunction in the general population of Spain. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May 4;53(6):2601-6.

• Akinci A, Cetinkaya E, Aycan Z. Dry eye syndrome in diabetic children. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov-Dec;17(6):873-8.

(p. 17) Contact Lens Care Compliance - Written Educational Materials Improve Lens Compliance

By Susan J. Gromacki, OD, MS, FAAO

• Yoder JS, Verani J, Heidman N, Hoppe-Bauer J, Alfonso EC, Miller D, Jones DB, Bruckner D, Langston R, Jeng BH, Joslin CE, Tu E, Colby K, Vetter E, Ritterband D, Mathers W, Kowalski RP, Acharya NR, Limaye AP, Leiter C, Roy S, Lorick S, Roberts J, Beach MJ. Acanthamoeba keratitis: The Persistence of Cases Following a Multistate Outbreak. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(4):221-5.

• Bennett ES. Lens care and patient education. In: Clinical Manual of Contact Lenses, Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 2000: 125-147.

(p. 18) Fitting Children Into Contact Lenses

By Edward S. Bennett, OD, MSEd, FAAO, Vinita Allee Henry, OD, FAAO

• Walline JJ, Jones LA, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. A randomized trial of the effects of rigid contact lenses on myopia progression. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1760-1766.

• Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott L, et al. Randomized trial of the effect of contact lens wear on self-perception in children. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86(3):222-232.

• Walline JJ, Jones LA, Rah MJ, et al. Contact Lenses in Pediatrics (CLIP) study: chair time and ocular health. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84(9):896-902.

• Terry RL, Stockton LA. Eyeglasses and children’s schemata. J Social Psychol 1993;133:425-438.

• Terry RL. Eyeglasses and gender stereotypes. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:694-697.

• Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott L, Manny RE, Gaume A, Rah MJ, Chitkara M, and Lyons S. A randomized trial of the effect of soft contact lenses on myopia progression in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49(11): 4702-4706.

• Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopia control. Curr Eye Res 2005;30:71-80.

• Children & contact lenses. Doctors’ attitudes practices in fitting children in contacts. AOA Research and Information Center, Sept. 2010. Available at www.aoa.org/childrenandcontactlenses.

• Aller TA. Results of a one-year prospective clinical trial (CONTROL) of the use of bifocal soft contact lenses to control myopia progression. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2006;26(1):8-9.

• Anstice NS, Phillips JR. Effect of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on axial myopia progression in children. Ophthalmol 2011;118(6):1152-1161.

• Walline J, Jones-Jordan LA, Greiner KL, McVey M. The effects of soft bifocal contact lenses on myopia progression in children. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88: E-Abstract: 110642.

• Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Smith E, 3rd, et al. Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52(13):9362-9367.

• Sindt CW. Tips for pediatric dispensing. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2011;26(9).

• Sindt CW. Twelve tips to improve your pediatric contact lens fitting. Contact Lens Spectrum 2012;27(6).

(p. 23) Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Through Contact Lenses

By Anuj Chauhan

• Bourlais CL, Acar L, Zia H, Sado PA, Needham T, Leverge R. Ophthalmic drug delivery systems. Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 17 (1), 33-58 (1998).

• TIMPOTIC prescribing information, supplied by Merck: Whitehouse Station, NJ.

• Lin MC, Graham AD, Polse KA, Mandell RB, McNamara NA. Measurement of post-lens tear thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 40, 2833–2839 (1999).

• Danjo Y, Nakamura M, Hamano T. Measurement of the human precorneal tear film with a non-contact optical interferometry film thickness measurement system. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 38, 260–266 (1994).

• Creech JL, Do LT, Fatt I, Radke CJ. In vivo tear-film thickness determination and implications for tear-film stability. Curr Eye Res. 17,1058–1066 (1998).

• Creech JL, Chauhan A, Radke CJ. Dispersive mixing in the posterior tear film under a soft contact lens. Ind Eng

• Chem Res. 40,3015-3026 (2001).

• McNamara NA, Polse KA, Brand RJ, Graham AD, Chan JS, McKenney CD. Tear mixing under a soft contact

• lens: Effects of lens diameter. Am J Ophthalmol. 127, 659-665 (1999).

• Li CC, Chauhan A. Modeling ophthalmic drug delivery by soaked contact lenses. Ind Eng Chem Res. 45, 3718-3734 (2006).

• Gulsen D, Chauhan A. Ophthalmic drug delivery through contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 45, 2342–2347 (2004).

• Gasset AR, Ishii Y, Kaufman HE, Miller T. Cytotoxicity of ophthalmic preservatives. Am J Ophthalmol. 78, 98

• 105 (1974).

• Berdy GJ, Abelson MB, Smith LM, George MA. Preservative-free artificial tear parathions assessment of

• corneal epithelial toxic effects. Arch Ophthalmol. 110, 528-532 (1992).

• Jung HJ, Chauhan A. Temperature sensitive contact lenses for triggered ophthalmic drug delivery. Biomaterials. 33, 2289-2300 (2012).

• Peng CC, Kim J, Chauhan A. Extended delivery of hydrophilic drugs from silicone-hydrogel contact lenses containing Vitamin E diffusion barriers. Biomaterials. 31, 4032–4047 (2010).

• Peng CC, Ben-Shlomo A, Mackay EO, Plummer CE, Chauhan A. Drug delivery by contact lens in

• spontaneously glaucomatous dogs. Curr. Eye Res. 37(3), 204-211 (2012).

• Peng CC, Burke MT, Carbia BE, Plummer C, Chauhan A. Extended drug delivery by contact lenses for glaucoma therapy. J. Control. Release 162(1), 152-158 (2012)

• Ciolino JB, Hoare TR, Iwata NG, Behlau I, Dohlman CH, Langer R, Kohane DS. A drug-eluting contact lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(7), 3346-3352 (2009).

• Hiratani H, Alvarex-Lorenzo C. The nature of backbone monomers determines the performance of imprinted soft contact lenses as timolol drug delivery systems. Biomaterials. 25, 1105-1113 (2004).

• Venkatesh S, Sizemore SP, Byrne ME. Novel biomimetic hydrogels for enhanced loading and extended release

• of ocular therapeutics. Biomaterials. 28, 717-724 (2007).

• Hiratani H, Fujiwara A, Tamiya Y, Mizutani Y, Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Ocular release of timolol from molecularly imprinted soft contact lenses. Biomaterials. 26 ,1293-1298 (2005).

• http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00446056

(p. 30) The Quest for the Ultimate Contact Lens

By Mark Draper, BOptom, MCOptom, MBA; Inma Pérez-Gómez, PhD, MCOptom, FAAO, FBCLA; Tim Giles, OD, MBA, FBCLA, FIACLE

• Rah M, Walline J, Jones-Jordan L, Sinnott L, Mackson J, et al.: Vision Specific Quality of Life of Pediatric Contact Lens Wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87(8): 560-6.

• Stapleton F, Stretton S, et al.: Silicone hydrogel contact lenses and the ocular surface. Ocul Surf 2006; 4(1): 24-43.

• Nichols, J. Contact lenses 2011. Contact Lens Spectrum. January 2012; 27(1):20-25.

• Morgan, P. et al. International Contact Lens Prescribing in 2011. Contact Lens Spectrum. January 2012; 27(1):26-31.

• Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, Nichols JJ. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea 2007;26:168-74.

• Rumpakis J. New Data on Contact Lens Dropouts: An International Perspective. Review of Optometry 2010; 147(1): 37-42

• Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens 2006; 32:281-286.

• DEWS Report (no authors) The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf 2007;5(2):75.

• McCulley J, Shine W. The lipid layer of tears: dependent on meibomian gland function. Experimental Eye Research. 2004; 78:361-365.

• Korb D, Greiner J, Glonek T. Tear Film Lipid Layer Formation: Implications for Contact Lens Wear. Optometry and Vision Science. 1996; 73(3):189-192

• Guillon M, Maissa C. Contact Lens Wear Affects Tear Film Evaporation. Eye & Contact Lens. 2008; 34(6):326-330

• Wolffsohn J, Hunt O, Chowdhury A. Objective clinical performance of ‘comfort-enhanced’ daily disposable soft contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33(2):88-92.

• Carney FP, Nash WL, et al.: The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49(1):120-124.

• Carnt N, Wilcox M, et al.: Corneal Staining: The IER Matrix Study. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007; 22(9): 38-43

• Holden B. Minimizing discomfort. Contact Lens Spectrum. April 2005; Supplement.

• Sweeney D, du Toit R, Keay L, et al. Clinical performance of silicone hydrogel lenses. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels. Second ed. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann; 2004:164-216.

• Fonn D. Preventing contact lens dropouts. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2002;17:26-32.

• Dumbleon K, Richter D, Woods C, Jones L, Fonn D. Compliance with Contact Lens Replacement in Canada and the United States. Optometry and Vision Science. 2010; 87(2): 131-139.

(p. 34) SiHy Performance Across Recommended Replacement Intervals

By Sheila Hickson-Curran, BSc(Hons), MCOptom, FAAO, Graeme Young, MPhil, PhD, FCOptom, DCLP, FAAO

• Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 1996;22:53-59.

• Donshik PC, Porazinski AD. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent-replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999;97:205-216.

• Solomon OD, Freeman MI, Boshnick EL, et al. A 3-year prospective study of the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lenses compared with frequent replacement and conventional daily wear contact lenses. CLAO J. 1996;22:250-257.

• Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, et al. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31:787-796.

• Chow LM, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H, et al. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel and FDA group II and group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2009;20:71-82.

• Clinical Performance Comparison of Two Contact Lenses. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00975585?term=NCT00975585&rank=1

• Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Ant Eye 2006; 29:25-30.

• Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1999;26:157-162.

• Hom MM, Bruce AS. Prelens tear stability: Relationship to symptoms of dryness. J Am Optom Assoc. 2009;80:181-184.

• Begley C, Renner D, Wilson G, et al. Ocular sensations and symptoms associated with tear break up. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506(Pt B):1127-1133.

• Timberlake GT, Doane MG, Bertera JH. Short-term, low contrast visual acuity reduction associated with in vivo contact lens drying. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69:755-760.

• Tutt R, Bradley A, Begley C, et al. Optical and visual impact of tear break-up in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:4117-4123.

(p. 39) Successful Strategies to Increase Multifocal Fits

By Keith Wan, OD

• Woods, J, et al. “Early Symptomatic Presbyopes – What Correction Modality Works Best?” Eye Contact Lens 2009;5: 221 – 226.

(p. 44) A Survey of Consecutive Corneal Topographies

By Bezalel Schendowich, OD, FIACLE

Jinabhai, et al., Pellucid corneal marginal degeneration: A review, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, April, 2011, pp. 56-63.

(p. 49) Pediatric and Teen CL Care - Using Contact Lenses Together With Vision Therapy

By Mary Lou French, OD, MEd, FAAO

1. Serna A, et al. Treatment of symptomatic convergence insufficiency with a home-based computer orthoptic exercise program. Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2011;15:140.

2. Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of treatments for symptomatic convergence insufficiency in children. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2008;126:1336.

(p. 50) Treatment Plan - Contact Lens, Surgical Options for Treating Keratoconus

By William L. Miller, OD, PhD, FAAO

Anwar M and Teichmann KD. Deep lamellar keratoplasty- surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descement’s membrane. Cornea 21:374-383, 2002.

Thompson, R.W., Price, M.O., Bowers, P.J., Price, F.W., Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 110, 1396–1402, 2003.

Tan, D.T.H., Anshu, A., Mehta, J.S., Paradigm shifts in corneal transplantation. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore 38, 332–339, 2009.

Kumar NL and Rootman DS. International Ophthalmology Clinics 50(3):77-88, 2010

(p. 56) Contact Lens Case Reports - New Thoughts on Anterior

Segment Sagittal Height

By Patrick J. Caroline, FAAO, Mark P. André, FAAO

Sagittal Height Uncovered, Patrick Caroline, Randy Kojima, Kelvin So OD, Beth Kinoshita OD, Matthew Lampa OD, Mark Andre, Poster, Global Specialty Lens Symposium – 2012 Las Vegas Nevada.

End Document #204