Contact Lens Spectrum
(p. 15) Research Review: New Gold Standard References for Contact Lens-Related Microbial Keratitis, By Loretta B. Szczotka-Flynn, OD, MS, FAAO
(p. 18) GP Insights: RK and Progressive Hyperopia, By Ann Laurenzi, OD, FAAO
(p. 19) Contact Lens Materials: A Second Look at a Second Lens, by Neil Pence, OD, FAAO
(p. 20) Dry Eye Dx and Tx: Winter Wonderland: Not for Dry Eye Sufferers, By William Townsend, OD, FAAO
Relative Humidlty New York City.CityRating.com
Silberstein E. Absolute and Relative Humidity HeatingHelp.com
(p. 21) Contact Lens Care and Compliance, By Michael A. Ward, MMSc, FAAO
Fiona Stapleton, Lisa Keay, Katie Edwards, Thomas Naduvilath, John K. G. Dart, Garry Brian, Brien A. Holden. The Incidence of Contact Lens–Related Microbial Keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1655–1662.
J. K. G. Dart, C. Radford, D. Minassian, S. Verma, F. Stapleton. Risk Factors for Microbial Keratitis with Contemporary Contact Lenses. A Case-Control Study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1647–1654.
(p. 24) Contact Lenses 2008, By Jason J. Nichols, OD, MPH, PhD, FAAO
1. Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry 2008;79:444-54.
2. Efron N, Morgan PB. Soft contact lens care regimens in the UK. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2008.
3. Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB. The Adsorption of Major Tear Film Lipids In Vitro to Various Silicone Hydrogels over Time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:120-4.
4. Iwata M, Ohno S, Kawai T, Ichijima H, Cavanagh HD. In vitro evaluation of lipids adsorbed on silicone hydrogel contact lenses using a new gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analytical method. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:272-80.
5. Green-Church KB, Nichols JJ. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses of contact lens deposition. Mol Vis 2008;14:291-7.
6. Zhao Z, Wei X, Aliwarga Y, Carnt NA, Garrett Q, Willcox MD. Proteomic analysis of protein deposits on worn daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Mol Vis 2008;14:2016-24.
7. Dumbleton KA, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:215-23.
8. Chalmers R, Long B, Dillehay S, Begley C. Improving contact-lens related dryness symptoms with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:778-84.
9. Geldis JR, Nichols JJ. The impact of punctal occlusion on soft contact lens wearing comfort and the tear film. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:261-5.
10. Ozkan J, Papas E. Lubricant effects on low dk and silicone hydrogel lens comfort. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:773-7.
11. Ramamoorthy P, Sinnott LT, Nichols JJ. Treatment, Material, Care, and Patient-related Factors in Contact Lens-Related Dry Eye. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:764-72.
12. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K et al. The incidence of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1655-62.
13. Dart JK, Radford CF, Minassian D, Verma S, Stapleton F. Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case-control study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1647-54, 1654 e1-3.
14. Shoff ME, Joslin CE, Tu EY, Kubatko L, Fuerst PA. Efficacy of contact lens systems against recent clinical and tap water Acanthamoeba isolates. Cornea 2008;27:713-9.
15. Hui A, Boone A, Jones L. Uptake and release of ciprofloxacin-HCl from conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:266-71.
16. Kim J, Conway A, Chauhan A. Extended delivery of ophthalmic drugs by silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Biomaterials 2008;29:2259-69.
17. Kapoor Y, Chauhan A. Drug and surfactant transport in Cyclosporine A and Brij 98 laden p-HEMA hydrogels. J Colloid Interface Sci 2008;322:624-33.
18. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott L et al. A randomized trial of the effect of soft contact lenses on myopia progression in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4702-6.
19. Efron S, Efron N, Morgan PB. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:201-10.
20. Court H, Greenland K, Margrain TH. Evaluating patient anxiety levels during contact lens fitting. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:574-80.
21. Vision Exp West 2008 Annual Meeting, Robert W. Baird and Co, Inc. Presentation by Jeff. D. Johnson, OD CFA. September 2008.
22. Carnt, Evans, Holden, Naduvilath, Tilia, Papas, Willcox. IER Matrix Update: Adding Another Silicone Hydrogel. Contact Lens Spectrum. March 2008.
(p. 44) Contact Lens Practice Pearls: Reinforcing Your Treatment Plan, By Thomas G. Quinn, OD, MS, FAAO
1. “Meshing patient and physician goals” Strategic Medicine, January 1998,By Mary S. Stone, MA; Sheryl J. Bronkesh, MBA; Zachary B. Gerbarg, MD; and Steven D. Wood, PhD
(p. 47) Treatment Plan: Finding Relief for a Light-Sensitive Patient, By Leo Semes, OD, FAAO
2. Semes LP, Amos JF, Waterbor JW. The photic sneeze response: a descriptive report of a clinic population. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995; 66: 372-7.
3. Archibald MS, Amos JF. Auditory response to a photic stimulus. Optometry. 2003; 74: 50-4.
4. Stringham JM, Hammond BR. Macular pigment and visual performance under glare conditions. Optom Vis Sci. 2008; 85: 82-8. Erratum in: Optom Vis Sci. 2008; 85: 285.