Contact Lens Spectrum

References

May 2017

Document #258

(p. 13) Editor’s Perspective – Changing the World Is Always Disruptive
By Jason J. Nichols, OD, MPH, PhD

  1. www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/11/18/clayton-christensen-how-pursuit-of-profits-kills-innovation-and-the-us-economy/#2f66240f28eb

(p. 14) Refractive Focus – The Future of Myopia Studies
By David A. Berntsen, OD, PhD

FDA workshop link:
https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/ucm500404.htm

  1. Egashira SM, Kish LL, Twelker JD, Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Adams AJ. Comparison of cyclopentolate versus tropicamide cycloplegia in children. Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Dec;70:1019-1026.
  2. Manny RE, Hussein M, Scheiman M, Kurtz D, Niemann K, Zinzer K; COMET Study Group. Tropicamide (1%): an effective cycloplegic agent for myopic children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Jul;42:1728-1735.
  3. Moore KE, Benoit JS, Berntsen DA. Spherical Soft Contact Lens Designs and Peripheral Defocus in Myopic Eyes. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Mar;94:370-379.
  4. Berntsen DA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. A randomized trial using progressive addition lenses to evaluate theories of myopia progression in children with a high lag of accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Feb 13;53:640-649.
  5. Cheng X, Xu J, Chehab K, Exford J, Brennan N. Soft Contact Lenses with Positive Spherical Aberration for Myopia Control. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Apr;93:353-366.
  6. Gwiazda J, Deng L, Manny R, Norton TT; COMET Study Group. Seasonal variations in the progression of myopia in children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Feb 4;55:752-758.
  7. Schein OD, McNally JJ, Katz J, Chalmers RL, Tielsch JM, Alfonso E, Bullimore M, O’Day D, Shovlin J. The incidence of microbial keratitis among wearers of a 30-day silicone hydrogel extended-wear contact lens. Ophthalmology. 2005 Dec;112:2172-2179.

(p. 20) Dry Eye Dx and Tx – The Demodex-Ptergyium Connection
By Meagan LeGrand, BS, & Amber Gaume Giannoni, OD

  1. Cetinkaya A, Akova YA. Pediatric ocular acne rosacea: long-term treatment with systemic antibiotics. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;142:816-821.
  2. Donaldson KE, Karp CL, Dunbar MT. Evaluation and treatment of children with ocular rosacea. Cornea. 2007 Jan;26:42-46.
  3. Nazir SA, Murphy S, Siatkowski RM, Chodosh J, Siatkowski RL. Ocular rosacea in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;137:138-144.
  4. Ozcan AA, Ersoz TR, Dulger E. Management of severe allergic conjunctivitis with topical cyclosporin a 0.05% eyedrops. Cornea. 2007 Oct;26:1035-1038.
  5. Keklikci U, Soker SI, Sakalar YB, Unlu K, Ozekinci S, Tunik S. Efficacy of topical cyclosporin A 0.05% in conjunctival impression cytology specimens and clinical findings of severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep-Oct;52:357-362.
  6. Prabhasawat P, Tesavibul N, Mahawong W. A randomized double-masked study of 0.05% cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea 2012 Dec;31:1386-1393.

(p. 22) In Focus with Current Contact Lens Materials and Designs
By Lakshman N. Subbaraman, PhD, BSOptom, MSc

  1. Nichols J. Contact Lenses 2016. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2017 Jan;32:22-5, 27, 29, 55.
  2. Nichols JJ, Willcox MD, Bron AJ, Belmonte C, Ciolino JB, Craig JP, Dogru M, Foulks GN, Jones L, Nelson JD, Nichols KK, Purslow C, Schaumberg DA, Stapleton F, Sullivan DA; members of the TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 18;54:TFOS7-TFOS13.
  3. Council TV. Hindsight is 20/20/20: Protect Your Eyes from Digital Devices. 2015 Digital Eye Strain Report. Available at https://www.thevisioncouncil.org/sites/default/files/VC_DigitalEyeStrain_Report2015.pdf .
  4. Dumbleton K, Caffery B, Dogru M, Hickson-Curran S, Kern J, Kojima T, Morgan PB, Purslow C, Robertson DM, Nelson JD; members of the TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on epidemiology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 18;54:TFOS20-TFOS36.
  5. Jones L, Brennan NA, González-Méijome J, Lally J, Maldonado-Codina C, Schmidt TA, Subbaraman L, Young G, Nichols JJ; members of the TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the contact lens materials, design, and care subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 18;54:TFOS37-TFOS70.
  6. Coles C, Brennan N. Coefficient of friction and soft contact lens comfort. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:E-abstract:125603.
  7. Maissa C, Guillon M, Garofalo RJ. Contact lens-induced circumlimbal staining in silicone hydrogel contact lenses worn on a daily wear basis. Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Jan;38:16-26.
  8. Young G, Chalmers RL, Napier L, Hunt C, Kern J. Characterizing contact lens-related dryness symptoms in a cross-section of UK soft lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011 Apr;34:64-70.
  9. Young G. Evaluation of soft contact lens fitting characteristics. Optom Vis Sci. 1996 Apr;73:247-254.
  10. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Apr;47:1319-1328.
  11. Ramamoorthy P, Sinnott LT, Nichols JJ. Treatment, material, care, and patient-related factors in contact lens-related dry eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Aug85:764-772.
  12. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Varikooty J, Srinivasan S, Jones L. Protein deposition and clinical symptoms in daily wear of etafilcon lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Oct;89:1450-1459.
  13. Omali NB, Subbaraman LN, Coles-Brennan C, Fadli Z, Jones LW. Biological and Clinical Implications of Lysozyme Deposition on Soft Contact Lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jul;92:750-757.
  14. Sweeney D, du Toit R, Keay L, Jalbert I, Sankaridurg PR, Stern J, Skotnitsky C, Stephensen A, Covey M, Holden BA, Rao GN. Clinical performance of silicone hydrogel lenses. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone hydrogels: Continuous wear contact lenses. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004:164-216.
  15. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, Helland M, Efron N, Jones L, Beusekom M, Grupcheva CN, Jones D, Beeler-Kaupke M, Qi P, Tan K, Krasnanska J, Pult H, Ravn O, Santodomingo J, Vegh M, Fan C, Erdinest N, Jafarri A, Montani G, Itoi M, Chu B, Bendoriene J, Ziziuchin V, Van der Worp E, Lam W, Romualdez-Oo J, Abesamis-dichoso C, Gonzalez-Meijome J, Belousov V, Gierow P, Silih M, Hsiao J, Nichols J. International contact lens prescribing in 2016. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2017 Jan;32:30-35.
  16. Sweeney D. Silicone hydrogels: The rebirth of continuous wear contact lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000.
  17. Lorentz H, Jones L. Lipid deposition on hydrogel contact lenses: how history can help us today. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;84:286-295.
  18. Jones L, Subbaraman LN, Rogers R, Dumbleton K. Surface treatment, wetting and modulus of silicone hydrogels. Optician 2006;232:28-34.
  19. Dumbleton K. Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2002 Sep;25:137-146.
  20. Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, Sankaridurg PR, O’Hare N, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF. Superior epithelial arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:9-12.
  21. Dumbleton K, Jones L, Chalmers R, Williams-Lyn D, Fonn D. Clinical characterization of spherical post-lens debris associated with lotrafilcon high-Dk silicone lenses. CLAO J. 2000 Oct;26:186-192.
  22. Bergmanson JP, Tukler J, Leach NE, Alabdelmoneam M, Miller WL. Morphology of contact lens-induced conjunctival epithelial flaps: a pilot study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012 Aug;35:185-188.
  23. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom. 2002 May;85:193-197.
  24. Skotnitsky CC, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR. Two presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: Local and general. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Jan;83:27-36.
  25. Dumbleton K. Noninflammatory silicone hydrogel contact lens complications. Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Jan;29:S186-189; discussion S90-S91, S92-S94.
  26. Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR, Carnt N, Edwards K, Stretton S, Stapleton F. Microbial keratitis and vision loss with contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Jan;29:S131-4; discussion S143-S144, S192-S194.
  27. Schein OD, McNally JJ, Katz J, Chalmers RL, Tielsch JM, Alfonso E, Bullimore M, O’Day D, Shovlin J. The incidence of microbial keratitis among wearers of a 30-day silicone hydrogel extended-wear contact lens. Ophthalmology. 2005 Dec;112:2172-2179.
  28. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, Holden B. The epidemiology of microbial keratitis with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2013 Jan;39:79-85.
  29. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, Dart JK, Brian G, Holden BA. The incidence of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology. 2008 Oct;115:1655-1662.
  30. Chalmers RL, Wagner H, Mitchell GL, Lam DY, Kinoshita BT, Jansen ME, Richdale K, Sorbara L, McMahon TT. Age and other risk factors for corneal infiltrative and inflammatory events in young soft contact lens wearers from the Contact Lens Assessment in Youth (CLAY) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Aug 24;52:6690-6696.
  31. Chalmers RL, Keay L, McNally J, Kern J. Multicenter case-control study of the role of lens materials and care products on the development of corneal infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Mar;89:316-25.
  32. Chalmers RL, Keay L, Long B, Bergenske P, Giles T, Bullimore MA. Risk factors for contact lens complications in US clinical practices. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Oct;87:725-735.
  33. Szczotka-Flynn L, Diaz M. Risk of corneal inflammatory events with silicone hydrogel and low Dk hydrogel extended contact lens wear: a meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;84:247-256.
  34. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens. 2006 Dec;32:281-286.
  35. Chalmers RL, Dillehay S, Long B, Barr JT, Bergenske P, Donshik P, Secor G, Yoakum J. Impact of previous extended and daily wear schedules on signs and symptoms with high Dk lotrafilcon A lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;82:549-554.
  36. Dumbleton KA, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2008 Jul;34:215-223.
  37. Guillon M. Are silicone hydrogel contact lenses more comfortable than hydrogel contact lenses? Eye Contact Lens. 2013 Jan;39:86-92.
  38. Brennan N. Are silicone hydrogels really more comfortable? Contact Lens Spectrum. 2009 Apr;24:17.
  39. Young G. A fascinating but disappointing experiment. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2011 Dec;26:12.
  40. Bergenske P, Eiden B, Russell G, Epstein AB. Experts advise caution in abandoning hydrogel lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2005 Oct;20:15-16.
  41. Brennan NA. Beyond flux: total corneal oxygen consumption as an index of corneal oxygenation during contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;82:467-472.
  42. Morgan PB, Brennan NA, Maldonado-Codina C, Quhill W, Rashid K, Efron N. Central and peripheral oxygen transmissibility thresholds to avoid corneal swelling during open eye soft contact lens wear. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 Feb;92:361-365.
  43. Rathi VM, Mandathara PS, Vaddavalli PK, Srikanth D, Sangwan VS. Fluid filled scleral contact lens in pediatric patients: challenges and outcome. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012 Aug;35:189-192.
  44. Pullum KW, Whiting MA, Buckley RJ. Scleral contact lenses: the expanding role. Cornea. 2005 Apr;24:269-277.
  45. Pecego M, Barnett M, Mannis MJ, Durbin-Johnson B. Jupiter Scleral Lenses: the UC Davis Eye Center experience. Eye Contact Lens. 2012 May;38:179-182.
  46. Pullum K, Buckley R. Therapeutic and ocular surface indications for scleral contact lenses. Ocul Surf. 2007 Jan;5:40-48.
  47. Gungor I, Schor K, Rosenthal P, Jacobs DS. The Boston Scleral Lens in the treatment of pediatric patients. J AAPOS. 2008 Jun;12:263-267.
  48. Kok JH, Visser R. Treatment of ocular surface disorders and dry eyes with high gas-permeable scleral lenses. Cornea. 1992 Nov;11:518-522.
  49. Shah-Desai SD, Aslam SA, Pullum K, Beaconsfield M, Rose GE. Scleral contact lens usage in patients with complex blepharoptosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar-Apr;27:95-98.
  50. Nichols J. Contact Lenses 2014. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2015 Jan;30:22-27.
  51. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control. Curr Eye Res. 2005 Jan;30:71-80.
  52. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopia progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;93:1181-1185.
  53. Chan KY, Cheung SW, Cho P. Orthokeratology for slowing myopic progression in a pair of identical twins. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Apr;37:116-119.
  54. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Villa-Collar C, Gilmartin B, Gutierrez-Ortega R. Myopia control with orthokeratology contact lenses in Spain: refractive and biometric changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 31;53:5060-5065.
  55. Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, Takahashi H, Oshika T. Long-term effect of overnight orthokeratology on axial length elongation in childhood myopia: a 5-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jun 22;53:3913-3919.
  56. Charm J, Cho P. High myopia-partial reduction orthokeratology (HM-PRO): study design. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Aug;36:164-170.
  57. Loertscher M. Multifocal orthokeratology associated with rapid shortening of vitreous chamber depth in eyes of myopic children. Contact Lens Ant Eye. 2013 Dec;36(Suppl):e2.
  58. Aller TA, Laure A, Wildsoet C. Results of a one-year prospective clinical trial (CONTROL) of the use of bifocal soft contact lenses to control myopia progression. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Nov;26(Suppl):8-9.
  59. Atchison DA. Optical models for human myopic eyes. Vision Res. 2006 Jul;46:2236-2250.
  60. Walline JJ, Greiner KL, McVey ME, Jones-Jordan LA. Multifocal contact lens myopia control. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Nov;90:1207-1214.
  61. Anstice NS, Phillips JR. Effect of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on axial myopia progression in children. Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun;118:1152-1161.
  62. Kollbaum PS, Jansen ME, Tan J, Meyer DM, Rickert ME. Vision performance with a contact lens designed to slow myopia progression. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Mar;90:205-214.
  63. Cheng X, Chehab K, Brennan N, Xu J. Controlling myopia progression with positive spherical aberration in soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:E-abstract 130252.
  64. Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Smith E, 3rd, Naduvilath T, Chen X, de la Jara PL, Martinez A, Kwan J, Ho A, Frick K, Ge J. Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Dec 9;52:9362-9367.
  65. Peshek D, Semmaknejad N, Hoffman D, Foley P. Preliminary evidence that the limbal ring influences facial attractiveness. Evol Psychol. 2011 Apr 6;9:137-146.
  66. Shyu BP, Wyatt HJ. Appearance of the human eye: optical contributions to the “limbal ring”. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Sep;86:E1069-1077.
  67. Osborn-Lorenz K, Kakkassery J, Boree D, Pinto D. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis of daily disposable limbal ring contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2014 Sep;97:411-417.
  68. Young G, Young AG, Lakkis C. Review of complications associated with contact lenses from unregulated sources of supply. Eye Contact Lens. 2014 Jan;40:58-64.
  69. Steinemann TL, Pinninti U, Szczotka LB, Eiferman RA, Price FW, Jr. Ocular complications associated with the use of cosmetic contact lenses from unlicensed vendors. Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Oct;29:196-200.
  70. Singh S, Satani D, Patel A, Vhankade R. Colored cosmetic contact lenses: an unsafe trend in the younger generation. Cornea. 2012 Jul;31:777-779.
  71. Gaiser H, Ho C, Janier N, Wee A, Johnson C, Watanabe R. Practitioner Perceptions of Patients Wearing Decorative Contact Lenses Purchased Through Unauthorized Sellers. Eye Contact Lens. 2017 Mar;43:135-139.
  72. Bucci FA, Jr., Evans RE, Moody KJ, Tanner JB, Capozza RC, Klyce SD. The annular tinted contact lens syndrome: corneal topographic analysis of ring-shaped irregular astigmatism caused by annular tinted contact lenses. CLAO J. 1997 Jul;23:161-167.
  73. Steffen RB, Barr JT. Clear versus opaque soft contact lenses: initial comfort comparison. ICLC. 1993 Sep-Oct;20:184-186.
  74. Kodjikian L, Casoli-Bergeron E, Malet F, Janin-Manificat H, Freney J, Burillon C, Colin J, Steghens JP. Bacterial adhesion to conventional hydrogel and new silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;246:267-273.
  75. Moezzi AM, Varikooty J, Schulze M, Ngo W, Lorenz KO, Boree D, Jones LW. Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Jun;93:619-628.
  76. American Optometric Association. Consumers Beware: Buying Contact Lenses Without a Prescription Is Illegal and Dangerous. 2014 Oct. Available at http://wwwaoaorg/newsroom/consumers-beware-buying-contact-lenses-without-aprescription-is-illegal-and-dangerous?sso=y .
  77. Administration USFaD. Guidance for Industry, FDA Staff, Eye Care Professionals, and Consumers—Decorative, Non-Corrective Contact Lenses. Available at http://wwwfdagov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm071572htm .
  78. Commission FT. The Contact Lens Rule: A Guide for Prescribers and Sellers. Available at https://wwwftcgov/tips-advice/business-businesscenter/guidance/contactlens-rule-guide-prescribers-sellers 2012.
  79. Bennett ES. Contact lens correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2008 May;91:265-278.
  80. Legras R, Benard Y, Rouger H. Through-focus visual performance measurements and predictions with multifocal contact lenses. Vision Res. 2010 Jun 11;50:1185-1193.
  81. Montés-Micó R, Madrid-Costa D, Radhakrishnan H, Charman WN, Ferrer-Blasco T. Accommodative functions with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Aug;88:998-1004.
  82. Toshida H, Takahashi K, Sado K, Kanai A, Murakami A. Bifocal contact lenses: History, types, characteristics, and actual state and problems. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;2:869-877.
  83. Woods J, Woods CA, Fonn D. Early symptomatic presbyopes--what correction modality works best? Eye Contact Lens. 2009 Sep;35:221-226.
  84. Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 May;83:266-273.
  85. Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D. Stereoacuity with balanced presbyopic contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2011 Jan;94:76-81.
  86. Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, Coleman S. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 Nov;22:516-5127.
  87. Goldsmith W, Steel S. Rotational characteristics of toric contact lenses. ICLC. 1991 Nov0-Dec;18:227-230.

(p. 26) Avoid the Itch
By Robert Ensley, OD, & I. Ben Gaddie, OD

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Allergies. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/ToolsTemplates/EntertainmentEd/Tips/Allergies.html . Updated February 2, 2011. Accessed February 26, 2017.
  2. Singh K, Axelrod S, Bielory L. The epidemiology of ocular and nasal allergy in the United States, 1988-1994. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Oct;126:778-783.
  3. Rumpakis J. New Data on Contact Lens Dropouts: An International Perspective. Review Optom. 2010;147:37-42.
  4. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1999 Nov;26:157-162.
  5. Bielory L. Allergic and immunologic disorders of the eye. Part II: Ocular allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Dec; 106:1019-1032.
  6. Ackerman S, Smith LM, Gomes PJ. Ocular itch associated with allergic conjunctivitis: latest evidence and clinical management. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2016 Jan;7:52-67.
  7. McGill JI, Holgate ST, Church MK, Anderson DF, Bacon A. Allergic eye disease mechanisms. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Oct;82:1203-1214.
  8. Adamczyk DT. Allergic eye disease. In: Bartlett JD, Jaanus SD, eds. Clinical Ocular Pharmacology. 5th Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier, St Louis. 2007: 549-574.
  9. Katelaris, CH. Giant papillary conjunctivitis--a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1999;(228):17-20.
  10. Donshik PC. Giant papillary conjunctivitis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994;92:687-744.
  11. Doughty MJ, Potvin R. Pritchard N, Fonn D. Evaluation of the range of areas of the fluorescein staining patterns of the tarsal conjunctiva in man. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995;89(4):355-371.
  12. Kumar S. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a major review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;87:133-147.
  13. Leonardi A. Management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmol Ther. 2013 Dec;2:73-88.
  14. Guglielmetti S, Dart JK, Calder V. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis and atopic dermatitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;10(5):478–485.
  15. Tuft SJ, Kemeny DM, Dart JK, Buckley RJ. Clinical features of atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. 1991;Feb;98:150-158.
  16. McMonnies CW, Boneham GC. Keratoconus, allergy, itch, eye rubbing and hand dominance. Clin Exp Optom. 2003 Nov;866:376-384.
  17. Bielory B, Bielory L. Atopic dermatitis and keratoconjunctivitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2010 Aug;30:323-336.
  18. Karpecki PM. Contact lens wear and ocular allergy. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2012 Mar;27:26-32.
  19. Batta P, Tu EY. Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis. In: Holland EJ, Mannis MJ, Lee WB, eds. Ocular Surface Disease: Cornea, Conjunctiva, and Tear Film. Elsevier Saunders; 2013:103-110.
  20. Bielory BP, Shah S, Bielory L. Understanding Ophthalmic Antihistamines and Histamine Receptors. Rev cCornea cContact lLens. 2016 March 15:18-23. .
  21. Leonardi, A. Role of histamine in allergic conjunctivitis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 2000;(230):18-21.
  22. Adamczyk DT, Jaanus SD. Antiallergy drugs and decongestants. In: Bartlett JD, Jaanus SD, eds. Clinical Ocular Pharmacology. 5th Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier, St. Louis. 2007:245-261.
  23. Abelson MB, Yamamoto GK, Allansmith MR. Effects of ocular decongestants. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 May;98:856-858.
  24. Flach AJ. Corneal melts associated with topically applied nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Tr Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:205-210, discussion 210-212.
  25. Simons FE, Simons KJ. H1 Antihistamines: Current Status and Future Directions. World Allergy Organ J. 2008 Sep;1:145-155.
  26. Schargus M, Ivanova S, Kakkassery V, Dick HB, Joachim S. Correlation of tear film osmolarity and 2 different MMP-9 tests with common dry eye tests in a cohort of non-dry eye patients. Cornea. 2015 Jul;34:739-744.
  27. Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S, Naduvilath T, Papas E. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;84:309-315.

(p. 32) Straight Talk: Communicating Compliance
By Sarah Morgan, BSc(Hons), MPhil, MCOptom

  1. Dart JK, Stapleton F, Minassian D. Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis. Lancet. 1991 Sep 14;338:650-653.
  2. Dart JK, Radford CF, Minassian D, Verma S, Stapleton F. Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case-control study. Ophthalmology. 2008 Oct;115:1647-1654.
  3. Houang E, Lam D, Fan D, Seal D. Microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: relationship to climate, environment and contact-lens disinfection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Jul-Aug;95:361-367.
  4. Inoue N, Toshida H, Mamada N, Kogure N, Murakami A. Contact lens-induced infectious keratitis in Japan. Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Mar;33:65-69.
  5. Morgan PB, Efron N, Brennan NA, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Tullo AB. Risk factors for the development of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46:3136-3143.
  6. Radford CF, Bacon AS, Dart JK, Minassian DC. Risk factors for acanthamoeba keratitis in contact lens users: a case-control study. BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310:1567-1570.
  7. Radford CF, Minassian DC, Dart JK. Disposable contact lens use as a risk factor for microbial keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Nov;82:1272-1275.
  8. Saw SM, Ooi PL, Tan DT, Khor WB, Fong CW, Lim J, Cajucom-Uy HY, Heng D, Chew SK, Aung T, Tan AL, Chan CL, Ting S, Tambyah PA, Wong TY. Risk factors for contact lens-related fusarium keratitis: a case-control study in Singapore. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 May;125:611-617.
  9. Stapleton F, Dart JK, Minassian D. Risk factors with contact lens related suppurative keratitis. CLAO J. 1993 Oct;19:204-210.
  10. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, Dart JK, Brian G, Holden BA. The incidence of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology. 2008 Oct;115:1655-1662.
  11. Stapleton F, Keay L, Jalbert I, Cole N. The epidemiology of contact lens related infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;84:257-272.
  12. Morgan PB, Efron N, Toshida H, Nichols, JJ. An international analysis of contact lens compliance. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011 Oct;34:228.
  13. Cialdini, RB. Influence: Science and Practice. 4th edition, Pearson (2000) ISBN: 978-0321011473
  14. Burch, N. The Four Stages for Learning Any New Skill. Gordon Training International, 1970.
  15. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277:553-559.
  16. Carnegie D. How to win friends and influence people. Vermillion, 2006. ISBN- 10: 0091906814.
  17. Gray TB, Cursons RTM, Sherwan JF, Rose PR. Acanthamoeba, bacterial, and fungal contamination of lens storage cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jun;79:601-605.
  18. McLaughlin-Borlace L, Stapleton F, Matheson M, Dart JK. Bacterial biofilm on contact lenses and lens storage cases in wearers with microbial keratitis. J Appl Microbiol. 1998 May;84:827-838.
  19. Wu YT, Zhu H, Willcox M, Stapleton F. Impact of air-drying lens cases in various locations and positions. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Jul;87:465-468.
  20. Wu YT, Teng YJ, Nicholas M, Harmis N, Zhu H, Willcox MD, Stapleton F.. Impact of lens case hygiene guidelines on contact lens case contamination. Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Oct;88: E1180-1187.
  21. Shih KL, Hu J, Sibley M. The microbiological benefit of cleaning and rinsing contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1985;12:235-242.
  22. Larson E, Aiello A, Lee LV, Della-Latta P, Gomez-Duarte C, Lin S. Short- and long- term effects of handwashing with antimicrobial or plain soap in the community. J Community Health. 2003 Apr;28:139-150.
  23. Macdonald DJ, McKillop EC, Trotter S, Gray Jr A. Improving hand-washing performance—a crossover study of hand-washing in the orthopaedic department. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 May;88:289-291.

(p. 38) The Ocular Surface and Lens Comfort
By Geetha Kumar, MPhil Optometry; Sheeba Swarna, MPhil Optometry; & Rajeswari Mahadevan, PhD Optometry

  1. Rumpakis JM. New data on contact lens dropouts. Rev Optom. 2010 Jan;147:37-42.
  2. Evans VE, Carnt NA, Naduvilath TJ, Holden BA. Factors associated with drop out from silicone hydrogel contact lens daily wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 May;49:4839
  3. Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, Coleman S. A multi‐centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 Nov;22:516-527.
  4. Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, Nichols JJ. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea. 2007 Feb; 26:168-174.
  5. Weed K, Fonn D, Potvin R. Discontinuation of contact lens wear. Poster presented at the 1993 American Academy of Optometry meeting.
  6. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1999 Dec; 26:157-162.
  7. Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, Coleman S. A multi‐centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 Nov;22:516-527.
  8. Nichols JJ, Willcox MD, Bron AJ, Belmonte C, Ciolino JB, Craig JP, Dogru M, Foulks GN, Jones L, Nelson JD, Nichols KK, Purslow C, Schaumberg DA, Stapleton F, Sullivan DA; members of the TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Executive Summary Executive Summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct;54:TFOS7-TFOS13.
  9. Fonn D, Situ P, Simpson T. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Oct;76:700-704.
  10. de la Jara PL, Naduvilath T, Diec J, Holden B, Papas E. Discrimination of ocular discomfort between contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015 Feb;38:e19.
  11. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens–related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Apr;47:1319-1328.
  12. Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Willcox MD. Lipid, lipase and lipocalin differences between tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Curr Eye Res. 2002 Jan;25:227-235.
  13. Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Sweeney D, Willcox MD. Differences in clinical parameters and tear film of tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44:5116-5124.
  14. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Barrado-Navascués E, Rubido-Crespo MJ. Ocular Surface Comfort during the Day Assessed by Instant Reporting in Different Types of Contact and Non–Contact Lens Wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2010 Mar;36:96-100.
  15. Dumbleton KA, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2008 Jul;34:215-223
  16. Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye Contact Lens. 2013 Jan;39:93-99.
  17. Arita R, Itoh K, Inoue K, Kuchiba A, Yamaguchi T, Amano S. Contact lens wear is associated with decrease of meibomian glands. Ophthalmology. 2009 Mar;116:379-384.
  18. Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Simmons PA. In vitro and in vivo effects of a lubricant in a contact lens solution. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 Jul;22:319-329.
  19. Guillon M, Guillon JP. Hydrogel lens wettability during overnight wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1989 Oct;9:355-359.
  20. Efron N, Brennan NA. A survey of wearers of low water content hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 1988 May;71:86-90.

(p. 42) Contact Lens Practice Pearls – Your Problems Are Obvious—Sometimes
By David L. Kading, OD

  1. Dumbleton K, Caffery B, Dogru M, Hickson-Curran S, Kern J, Kojima T, Morgan PB, Purslow C, Robertson DM, Nelson JD; members of the TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on epidemiology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 18;54:TFOS20-TFOS36.
  2. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens. 2006 Dec;32:281-286.
  3. Nichols J. Contact Lenses 2015. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2015 Jan;30:22-27.
  4. Blackie CA, Korb DR, Knop E, Bedi R, Knop N, Holland EJ. Nonobvious obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2010 Dec;29:1333-1345.

(p. 44) The Scleral Lens Vault – Scleral Haptics: Sphere, Toric, or Multi-Meridian?
By Gregory W. DeNaeyer, OD

  1. van der Worp E. A Guide to Scleral Lens Fitting [monograph online]. Forest Grove, OR: Pacific University; 2010. Available at http://commons.pacificu.edu/mono/4 .
  2. Ritzmann M, Caroline P, Walker M, Stephens P, Kojima R, Kinoshita B, Lampa M, André M, Zheng F. Understanding scleral shape with the Eaglet Eye Surface Profiler. Scientific Poster presented at the Global Specialty Lens Symposium, Las Vegas, January 2015.
  3. Kinoshita B, Morrison S, Caroline P, Kojima R, Lampa M. Corneal Torcity and Scleral Asymmetry…Are they Related? Scientific Poster presented at the Global Specialty Lens Symposium, Las Vegas, January 2016.
  4. Siebert S, Jedlicka J. Utilizing Corneal Topography to Aid in Predicting Scleral Topography for the Purpose of Fitting Scleral Contact Lenses. Scientific Poster presented at the Global Specialty Lens Symposium, Las Vegas, January 2017.
  5. Visser ES, Visser R, van Lier HJ. Advantages of Toric Scleral Lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Apr;83:233-236.
  6. Visser ES, Visser R, van Lier HJ, Otten HM. Modern Scleral Lenses Part II: Patient Satisfaction. Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Jan;33:21-25.

(p. 46) Treatment Plan – The Effects of Diabetes on the Ocular Surface
By William L. Miller, OD, PHD, MS

  1. Schultz RO, Van Horn DL, Peters MA, Klein KM, Schutten WH. Diabetic keratopathy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1981;79:180-199.
  2. Rao GN. Dr. P. Siva Reddy Oration. Diabetic Keratopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1987;35(5-6):16-36.
  3. Kaji Y. Prevention of diabetic keratopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;89:254-255.
  4. Wylegala E, Mocko L, Woyna-Orlewicz A, Teper S, Orzechowska-Wylegala B. Diabetic complications within ocular surface. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2006 Nov;21:495-497.
  5. Gao Y, Zhang Y, Ru YS, Wang XW, Yang JZ, Li CH, Wang HX, Li XR, Li B. Ocular surface changes in type II diabetic patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 18;8:358-364.
  6. Inoue K, Okugawa K, Amano S, Oshika T, Takamura E, Egami F, Umizu G, Aikawa K, Kato S. Blinking and superficial punctate keratopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eye (Lond). 2005 Apr;19:418-421.
  7. Nepp J, Abela C, Polzer I, Derbolav A, Wedrich A. Is there a correlation between the severity of diabetic retinopathy and keratoconjunctivitis sicca? Cornea. 2000 Jul;19:487-491.
  8. Mackie IA. Current ocular therapy. In: Fraunfelder F, Roy FH eds. Current Ocular Therapy. 6th edition, 2008.
  9. Kramerov AA, Saghizadeh M, Ljubimov AV. Adenoviral gene therapy for diabetic keratopathy: Effects on wound healing and stem cell marker expression in human organ-cultured corneas and limbal epithelial cells. J Vis Exp. 2016 Apr 7;(110):e54058
  10. Kramerov AA, Ljubimov AV. Stem cell therapies in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy and keratopathy. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016 Mar;241:559-568.
  11. Yamada N, Matsuda R, Morishige N, Yanai R, Chikama TI, Nishida T, Ishimitsu T, Kamiya A. Open clinical study of eye-drops containing tetrapeptides derived from substance P and insulin-like growth factor-1 for treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defects associated with neurotrophic keratopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul;92:896-900.
  12. Bonini S, Lambiase A, Rama P, Capriogli G, Aloe L. Topical treatment with nerve growth factor for neurotrophic keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2000 Jul;107:1347-1352.
  13. Zagon IS, Klocek MS, Sassani JW, Mauger DT, McLaughlin PJ. Corneal safety of topically applied naltrexone. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Oct;22:377-387.

(p. 48) Reader and Industry Forum – Fitting Over a Superficial Fibroplastic Nodule
By Bezalel Schendowich, OD

  1. Moodaley L, Liu C, Woodward EG, O’Brart D, Muir MK, Buckley R. Excimer Laser in Superficial Keratectomy for Proud Nebulae in Keratoconus. Br J. Ophthalmol. 1994 Jun;78:454-457.
  2. Mandell RB, Barsky BA, Moore CF. A New Lens for Keratoconus. Contact Lens Spectrum. 1995 Dec;10:17-22.
  3. Schendowich B. A Case of Cyclic Keratoconus. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2008 Dec;23:50-51.
  4. Schendowich B. Good Eye Days, Bad Eye Days. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2000 Aug;15:54, 56.
  5. Caroline PJ, Andre MA, Norman C. Corneal Topography in Keratoconus. Contact Lens Spectrum. 1997 Jul;12:36-39.
  6. Kenney MC, Brown DJ. The Cascade Hypothesis of Keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2003 Sep;26:139-146.
  7. Schendowich B. Experience with the ‘Duozone’ Lens: Fitting the Proud Nebula. Contact Lens Spectrum. 1999 Dec;14:44-47.

(p. 56) Contact Lens Case Reports – Multifocal Soft Lens Designs for Myopia Control
By Patrick J. Caroline & Mark P. André

  1. Tse DY, To CH. Graded Competing Regional Myopic and Hyperopic Defocus Produces Summated Emmetropization Set Points in Chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sept;52:8056-8062.
  2. Benavente-Pérez A, Nour A, Troilo, D. Axial Eye Growth and Refractive Error Development Can be Modified By Exposing the Peripheral Retina to Relative Myopic and Hyperopic Defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Sept;55:6765-6773.