Contact Lens Spectrum


September 2017

Document #262

(p. 11) Editor’s Perspective – The Trials and Tribulations of Getting to Market
By Jason J. Nichols, OD, MPH, PhD

  1. DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industyr: New estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ. 2016 May;47:20-33. Available at . Accessed on Aug 27, 2017.
  2. Americans say discussions about clinical trials should be part of standar of care. Available at . Accessed on Aug 27, 2017.

(p. 12) International Perspectives – Scandinavian Design and Daily Disposable Heaven
By Eef van der Worp, BOptom, PhD, & Bo Lauenborg, BOptom

  1. Bullimore MA. The Safety of Soft Contact Lenses in Children. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 June;94:638-646.
  2. Dahl AK. Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses in Sweden. . 2002 Sept.
  3. Fonn D, Sweeney D. Contact Lenses: The Last 30 Years. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2016 Sept;31:22-27.
  4. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, et al. International Contact Lens Prescribing 2016. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2017 Jan;32:30-35.

(p. 14) Prescribing for Presbyopia – Pupil Measurement: Hitting a Moving Target
By Craig W. Norman

  1. Cardona G, López S. Pupil diameter, working distance and illumination during habitual tasks. Implications for simultaneous vision contact lenses for presbyopia. J Optom. 2016 Apr-Jun;9:78-84.

(p. 17) Contact Lens Design & Materials – High-Modulus Soft Contact Lens Clinical Condititions
By Andrew D. Pucker, OD, PhD

  1. Dumbleton K. Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2002 Sep;25:137-146.
  2. Horst CR, Brodland B, Jones LW, Brodland GW. Measuring the modulus of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Oct;89:1468-1476.
  3. Young G, Garofalo R, Harmer O, Peters S. The effect of soft contact lens care products on lens modulus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010 Oct;33:210-214.
  4. Dumbleton K. Noninflammatory silicone hydrogel contact lens complications. Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Jan;29:S186-189; discussion S190-S181, S192-S184.
  5. Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, et al. Superior epithelial arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2001 Jan;78:9-12.
  6. Tan J, Keay L, Jalbert I, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. Mucin balls with wear of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Apr;80:291-297.
  7. Donshik PC, Ehlers WH, Ballow M. Giant papillary conjunctivitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;28:83-103.

(p. 18) Dry Eye Dx and Tx – My “N” of One
By Katherine M. Mastrota, MS, OD

  1. Walsh NP, Fortes MB, Raymond-Barker P, et al. Is whole-body hydration an important consideration in dry eye? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Sep 25;53:6622-6627.
  2. Kobayashi M, Igarashi T, Takahashi H, Fujimoto C, Suzuki H, Takahashi H. The correlation between plasma osmolarity and tear osmolarity. Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 2. [Epub ahead of print]
  3. Armstrong LE. Assessing hydration status: the elusive gold standard. J Am Coll Nutr. 2007 Oct;26(5 Suppl):575S-584S.
  4. Ungaro CT, Reimel AJ, Nuccio RP, Barnes KA, Pahnke MD, Baker LB. Non-invasive estimation of hydration status changes through tear fluid osmolarity during exercise and post-exercise rehydration. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 May;115:1165-1175.
  5. Institute of Medicine of the The National Academies. Report Sets Dietary Intake Levels for Water, Salt, and Potassium to Maintain Health and Reduce Chronic Disease Risk. 2004 Feb 11. Available at . Accessed on July 4, 2017.

(p. 19) Contact Lens Care & Compliance – Identifying Ocular Pathogens
By Andrew D. Pucker, OD, PhD

  1. Sankaridurg P, Lazon de la Jara P, Holden B. The future of silicone hydrogels. Eye Contact Lens. 2013 Jan;39:125-129.
  2. Kanski JJ. Clinical ophthalmology : a systematic approach. 6th ed. Edinburgh ; New York: Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier; 2007.
  3. McDonnell PJ, Nobe J, Gauderman WJ, Lee P, Aiello A, Trousdale M. Community care of corneal ulcers. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Nov 15;114:531-538.
  4. AAO Cornea/External Disease PPP Panel. Bacterial Keratitis PPP - 2013. American Academy of Ophthalmology 2013. Available at: . Accessed on March 20, 2017.
  5. Pakzad-Vaezi K, Levasseur SD, Schendel S, Mark S, Mathias R, Roscoe D, Holland SP. The corneal ulcer one-touch study: a simplified microbiological specimen collection method. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;159:37-43.e31.
  6. Sharma S. Diagnosis of infectious diseases of the eye. Eye (Lond). 2012 Feb;26:177-184.

(p. 44) Contact Lens Practice Pearls – When Custom Is Easy and We Are All Specialists
By David L. Kading, OD

  1. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control. Curr Eye Res. 2005 Jan;30:71–80.
  2. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopia progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;93:1181-1185.
  3. Eiden SB, Davis RL, Bennett ES, DeKinder JO. The SMART Study: Background, Rationale, and Baseline Resilts. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2009 Oct;24:24-28, 30-31.

(p. 45) Orthokeratology Today – Starting Ortho-k—For You and Your Patients
By Michael J. Lipson, OD

  1. Lipson MJ. Long-term clinical outcomes for overnight corneal reshaping in children and adults. Eye Contact Lens. 2008 Mar;34:94-99.
  2. Berntsen DA, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The Effect of Overnight Contact Lens Corneal Reshaping on Higher-Order Aberrations and Best-Corrected Visual Acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;82:490-497.
  3. Charm J. Orthokeratology: Clinical utility and patient perspectives. Clin Optom. 2017 Feb 7:9 33-40.
  4. Lipson MJ, Sugar A, Musch DC. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Oct;82:886-891.
  5. Hiraoka T, Okamoto C, Ishii Y, et al. Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes After Overnight Orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jul;86:8750-882.
  6. Queirós A, Villa-Collar C, Gutiérrez AR, Jorge J, González-Méijome JM. Quality of Life of Myopic Subjects With Different Methods of Visual Correction Using the NEI RQL-42 Questionnaire. Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Mar;38:116-121.

(p. 48) The Scleral Lens Vault – Vaulting Scleral Obstacles
By Gregory W. DeNaeyer, OD

  1. Mimura T, Usui T, Mori M, et al. Pinguecula and contact lenses. Eye (Lond). 2010 Nov;24:1685-1691.
  2. Viso E, Gude F, Rodriguez-Ares MT. Prevalence of pinguecula and pterygium in a general population in Spain. Eye (Lond). 2011 Mar;24:350-357.
  3. Harthan J, Nau CB, Barr J, et al. Scleral Lens Prescription and Management Practices: The SCOPE Study. Eye and Contact Lens. 2017 Apr 6. [Epub ahead of print]

(p. 49) Treatment Plan – Effects of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine
By William L. Miller, OD, MS, PhD

  1. Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein, AS. Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov;357:2153-2165.
  2. Alarcón GS, McGwin G, Bertoli AM, et al. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on the survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: data from LUMINA, a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA L). Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Sep;66:1168-1172.
  3. Marmor MF, Kellner U, Lau TY, Melles RB, Mieler WF, American Academy of Ophthalmology. Recommendations on screening for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine retinopathy (2016 Revision). Opthalmology. 2016 Jun;123:1386-1394.
  4. Chen E, Brown DM, Benz MS, et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography as an effective screening test for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy (the "flying saucer" sign). Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Oct 21;4:1151-1158.